What are the chances of seeing a Scarlet Skimmer in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Scarlet Skimmer sighting in Kaeng Krachan National Park on a given day, based on 32 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 55th most-seen of the 296 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Scarlet Skimmer in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
April
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Scarlet Skimmer in Kaeng Krachan National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–February and August–September, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Scarlet Skimmer?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Scarlet Skimmer sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kaeng Krachan National Park the best place to see a Scarlet Skimmer?
7th of 13
Of the 13 parks where we can rate Scarlet Skimmer sightings, Kaeng Krachan National Park ranks 7th at about 20%. The best odds are in Sundarbans National Park (India, about 40%), Keoladeo National Park (India, about 40%) and Royal Bardia National Park (Nepal, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Scarlet Skimmer live in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
Same family: Libellulidae
The closest relatives of the Scarlet Skimmer that you can see in Kaeng Krachan National Park (family Libellulidae, Skimmers) are Russet Percher (about 30%), Blue Marsh Hawk (about 20%) and Orange Skimmer (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Scarlet Skimmer sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Scarlet Skimmer is recorded against all the insects logged in Kaeng Krachan National Park (32 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.