Hyalinarcha hyalina
In 3 days ~40% in a week ~70%
Hyalinarcha hyalina is a moth in the family Crambidae. It was described by George Hampson in 1913. It is found in Western New Guinea, Indonesia. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kanha National Park | 🇮🇳 India |
More parks will be added in future updates.
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Hyalinarcha hyalina sighting in Kanha National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 81st most-seen of the 106 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
July
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Hyalinarcha hyalina in Kanha National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–June, August–October and December, the lowest months. That is one of Kanha National Park's wettest months, with about 430 mm of rain against 10 mm in November.
Between 10 pm and 1 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Hyalinarcha hyalina sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Only Kanha National Park, in our data
Kanha National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Hyalinarcha hyalina sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Crambidae
The closest relatives of the Hyalinarcha hyalina that you can see in Kanha National Park (family Crambidae, Crambid Snout Moths) are Hawaiian Beet Webworm Moth (about 40%), Banded Pearl (about 30%) and Cirrhochrista brizoalis (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Hyalinarcha hyalina is recorded against all the insects logged in Kanha National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
