Leucinodes apicalis
In 3 days ~40% in a week ~70%
Analyta apicalis is a moth in the family Crambidae. It was described by George Hampson in 1896. It is found in India, Sri Lanka and Taiwan. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kanha National Park | 🇮🇳 India |
More parks will be added in future updates.
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Leucinodes apicalis sighting in Kanha National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 67th most-seen of the 106 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February and August
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Leucinodes apicalis in Kanha National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, April–July and September–October, the lowest months. Those are among Kanha National Park's wettest months, with about 200 mm of rain a month against 10 mm in November.
Between 9 pm and midnight
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Leucinodes apicalis sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Only Kanha National Park, in our data
Kanha National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Leucinodes apicalis sightings: about 20% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Crambidae
The closest relatives of the Leucinodes apicalis that you can see in Kanha National Park (family Crambidae, Crambid Snout Moths) are Hawaiian Beet Webworm Moth (about 40%), Banded Pearl (about 30%) and Cirrhochrista brizoalis (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Leucinodes apicalis is recorded against all the insects logged in Kanha National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
