Anthipes solitaris
Silhouette: Martin Bulla, based on François Desbordes' illustration · PhyloPic
In 3 days <5% in a week ~10%
The rufous-browed flycatcher (Anthipes solitaris) is a species of bird in the family Muscicapidae. It is native to Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Thailand and Vietnam. Its natural habitat is subtropical or tropical moist montane forests. It was formerly placed in the genus Ficedula. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kaeng Krachan National Park | 🇹🇭 Thailand | |
| 2 | Kerinci Seblat National Park | 🇮🇩 Indonesia |
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-browed Flycatcher sighting in Kerinci Seblat National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 178th most-seen of the 203 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
May
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-browed Flycatcher in Kerinci Seblat National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–April and June–December, the lowest months. January has too few records to rate.
2nd of 2
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Rufous-browed Flycatcher sightings, Kerinci Seblat National Park ranks 2nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Kaeng Krachan National Park (Thailand, about 10%).
Same family: Muscicapidae
The closest relatives of the Rufous-browed Flycatcher that you can see in Kerinci Seblat National Park (family Muscicapidae, Old World Flycatchers, Robins, and Chats) are Sunda Forktail (about 40%), Shiny Whistling-Thrush (about 40%) and Snowy-browed Flycatcher (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous-browed Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Kerinci Seblat National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
