What are the chances of seeing a Eudocima aurantia in Khao Yai National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Eudocima aurantia sighting in Khao Yai National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 149th most-seen of the 221 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Eudocima aurantia in Khao Yai National Park?
May–June and August–October
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Eudocima aurantia in Khao Yai National Park on a given day, against under 5% in November to April, the lowest months. Those are among Khao Yai National Park's wettest months, with about 230 mm of rain a month against 15 mm in December.
What time of day is best to see a Eudocima aurantia?
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Eudocima aurantia sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Khao Yai National Park the best place to see a Eudocima aurantia?
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Eudocima aurantia sightings, Khao Yai National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Daintree National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Eudocima aurantia live in Khao Yai National Park?
Same genus: Eudocima
The closest relatives of the Eudocima aurantia that you can see in Khao Yai National Park (genus Eudocima, Fruit-piercing Moths) are Common Fruit-Piercing Moth (about 10%) and Green Fruit-Piercing Moth (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Eudocima aurantia sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Eudocima aurantia is recorded against all the insects logged in Khao Yai National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.