What are the chances of seeing a Hill Blue Flycatcher in Khao Yai National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Hill Blue Flycatcher sighting in Khao Yai National Park on a given day, based on 427 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 73rd most-seen of the 278 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Hill Blue Flycatcher in Khao Yai National Park?
December
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Hill Blue Flycatcher in Khao Yai National Park on a given day, against about 10% in April and June–September, the lowest months. That is one of Khao Yai National Park's driest months, with about 15 mm of rain against 330 mm in September.
What time of day is best to see a Hill Blue Flycatcher?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Hill Blue Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Khao Yai National Park the best place to see a Hill Blue Flycatcher?
Among the best
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Hill Blue Flycatcher sightings, Khao Yai National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Doi Inthanon National Park (Thailand, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Hill Blue Flycatcher live in Khao Yai National Park?
Same genus: Cyornis
The closest relatives of the Hill Blue Flycatcher that you can see in Khao Yai National Park (genus Cyornis, Blue Flycatchers and Jungle Flycatchers) are Hainan Blue-Flycatcher (about 20%) and Javan Blue Flycatcher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Hill Blue Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Hill Blue Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Khao Yai National Park (427 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.