What are the chances of seeing a Psilogramma discistriga in Khao Yai National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Psilogramma discistriga sighting in Khao Yai National Park on a given day, based on 17 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 73rd most-seen of the 221 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Psilogramma discistriga in Khao Yai National Park?
August
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Psilogramma discistriga in Khao Yai National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–May and October–December, the lowest months. That is one of Khao Yai National Park's wettest months, with about 260 mm of rain against 15 mm in December.
What time of day is best to see a Psilogramma discistriga?
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Psilogramma discistriga sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Where else can you see a Psilogramma discistriga?
Only Khao Yai National Park, in our data
Khao Yai National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Psilogramma discistriga sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Psilogramma discistriga live in Khao Yai National Park?
Same family: Sphingidae
The closest relatives of the Psilogramma discistriga that you can see in Khao Yai National Park (family Sphingidae, Sphinx Moths) are Yam Hawkmoth (about 20%), Jade Hawkmoth (about 20%) and Megacorma obliqua (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Psilogramma discistriga sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Psilogramma discistriga is recorded against all the insects logged in Khao Yai National Park (17 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.