What are the chances of seeing a Chestnut Wattle-eye in Kibale National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut Wattle-eye sighting in Kibale National Park on a given day, based on 299 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 85th most-seen of the 366 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chestnut Wattle-eye in Kibale National Park?
February
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut Wattle-eye in Kibale National Park on a given day, against about 10% in November, the lowest month. That is one of Kibale National Park's driest months, with about 20 mm of rain against 140 mm in November.
What time of day is best to see a Chestnut Wattle-eye?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chestnut Wattle-eye sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kibale National Park the best place to see a Chestnut Wattle-eye?
2nd of 4
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Chestnut Wattle-eye sightings, Kibale National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%. The best odds are in Semuliki National Park (Uganda, about 40%).
Which relatives of the Chestnut Wattle-eye live in Kibale National Park?
Same family: Platysteiridae
The closest relatives of the Chestnut Wattle-eye that you can see in Kibale National Park (family Platysteiridae, Wattle-eyes and Batises) are Black-and-white Shrike-flycatcher (about 40%), Brown-throated Wattle-eye (about 40%) and African Shrike-flycatcher (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chestnut Wattle-eye sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chestnut Wattle-eye is recorded against all the birds logged in Kibale National Park (299 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.