Anomala phlyctenopyga

Anomala phlyctenopyga

Anomala phlyctenopyga

Daily sighting probability ~10% · With luck
at Kinabalu Park

In 3 days ~30% in a week ~60%

9 Verified sightings at Kinabalu Park From 2019 to 2026
9 In 1 park
March Best month
🌅 Crepuscular When it's spotted

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability
1 Kinabalu Park 🇲🇾 Malaysia
~10%

More parks will be added in future updates.

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing an Anomala phlyctenopyga in Kinabalu Park?

With luck

About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Anomala phlyctenopyga sighting in Kinabalu Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 143rd most-seen of the 297 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see an Anomala phlyctenopyga in Kinabalu Park?

March

In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report an Anomala phlyctenopyga in Kinabalu Park on a given day, against under 5% in April, June and August–January, the lowest months.

What time of day is best to see an Anomala phlyctenopyga?

Between 7 and 10 pm

Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Anomala phlyctenopyga sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.

Where else can you see an Anomala phlyctenopyga?

Only Kinabalu Park, in our data

Kinabalu Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Anomala phlyctenopyga sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.

Where does the Anomala phlyctenopyga sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Anomala phlyctenopyga is recorded against all the insects logged in Kinabalu Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Kinabalu Park