Nevrina procopia
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~50%
Nevrina procopia is a moth in the family Crambidae. It was described by Stoll in 1781. The type locality is unknown. It is found from Sri Lanka, India, Bhutan, South China, Taiwan, southern Japan, Philippines, Malaysia, Singapore, Sumatra, Java, and New Guinea. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taroko National Park | 🇹🇼 Taiwan | |
| 2 | Kinabalu Park | 🇲🇾 Malaysia |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taipei | 🇹🇼 Taiwan |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Nevrina procopia sighting in Kinabalu Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 246th most-seen of the 297 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
May and November
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Nevrina procopia in Kinabalu Park on a given day, against under 5% in June, September–October and December–April, the lowest months.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Nevrina procopia sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Nevrina procopia sightings, Kinabalu Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Taroko National Park (Taiwan, about 10%).
Same family: Crambidae
The closest relatives of the Nevrina procopia that you can see in Kinabalu Park (family Crambidae, Crambid Snout Moths) are Arthroschista hilaralis (about 20%), Pylartes subcostalis (about 20%) and Talanga sabacusalis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Nevrina procopia is recorded against all the insects logged in Kinabalu Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
