Grammodora nigrolineata
In 3 days ~10% in a week ~30%
Grammodora is a monotypic moth genus in the family Lasiocampidae erected by Per Olof Christopher Aurivillius in 1927. Its only species, Grammodora nigrolineata, had been described by the same author but in 1890. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kruger National Park | 🇿🇦 South Africa |
More parks will be added in future updates.
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black Lined Eggar sighting in Kruger National Park on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 358th most-seen of the 748 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February–March and December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black Lined Eggar in Kruger National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January and April–November, the lowest months. Those are among Kruger National Park's wettest months, with about 80 mm of rain a month against almost none in August.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black Lined Eggar sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Only Kruger National Park, in our data
Kruger National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Black Lined Eggar sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Lasiocampidae
The closest relatives of the Black Lined Eggar that you can see in Kruger National Park (family Lasiocampidae, Lappet Moths) are Henometa clarki (about 10%), Beralade perobliqua (about 10%) and Sena prompta (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black Lined Eggar is recorded against all the insects logged in Kruger National Park (12 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
