Odontopacha fenestrata
In 3 days ~10% in a week ~20%
Odontopacha fenestrata is a species of moth in the family Lasiocampidae. The species was first described by Per Olof Christopher Aurivillius in 1909. It is found in Somalia and Tanzania. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kruger National Park | 🇿🇦 South Africa |
More parks will be added in future updates.
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Odontopacha fenestrata sighting in Kruger National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 519th most-seen of the 748 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
December and January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Odontopacha fenestrata in Kruger National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February to November, the lowest months. Those are among Kruger National Park's wettest months, with about 95 mm of rain a month against almost none in August.
Between 5 and 8 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Odontopacha fenestrata sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Only Kruger National Park, in our data
Kruger National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Odontopacha fenestrata sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Lasiocampidae
The closest relatives of the Odontopacha fenestrata that you can see in Kruger National Park (family Lasiocampidae, Lappet Moths) are Henometa clarki (about 10%), Beralade perobliqua (about 10%) and Sena prompta (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Odontopacha fenestrata is recorded against all the insects logged in Kruger National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
