What are the chances of seeing a Eumelea rosalia in Lamington National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Eumelea rosalia sighting in Lamington National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 308th most-seen of the 430 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Eumelea rosalia in Lamington National Park?
February and March
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Eumelea rosalia in Lamington National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May to January, the lowest months. Those are among Lamington National Park's wettest months, with about 160 mm of rain a month against 40 mm in August.
What time of day is best to see a Eumelea rosalia?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Eumelea rosalia sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Lamington National Park the best place to see a Eumelea rosalia?
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Eumelea rosalia sightings, Lamington National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Springbrook National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Eumelea rosalia live in Lamington National Park?
Same family: Geometridae
The closest relatives of the Eumelea rosalia that you can see in Lamington National Park (family Geometridae, Geometer Moths) are Southern Bracca (about 20%), Comostola laesaria (about 10%) and Neat Epidesmia (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Eumelea rosalia sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Eumelea rosalia is recorded against all the insects logged in Lamington National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.