What are the chances of seeing a Euryglottis aper in Los Nevados National Natural Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Euryglottis aper sighting in Los Nevados National Natural Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 14th most-seen of the 32 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Euryglottis aper in Los Nevados National Natural Park?
March
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Euryglottis aper in Los Nevados National Natural Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–February and June–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Euryglottis aper?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Euryglottis aper sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Where else can you see a Euryglottis aper?
Only Los Nevados National Natural Park, in our data
Los Nevados National Natural Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Euryglottis aper sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Euryglottis aper live in Los Nevados National Natural Park?
Same order: Lepidoptera
The closest relatives of the Euryglottis aper that you can see in Los Nevados National Natural Park (order Lepidoptera, Butterflies and Moths) are Clysonymus Longwing (about 20%), Corinna Daggerwing (about 20%) and Perisama humboldtii (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Euryglottis aper sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Euryglottis aper is recorded against all the insects logged in Los Nevados National Natural Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.