Bryolymnia poasia
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
Bryolymnia poasia is a moth of the family Noctuidae first described by William Schaus in 1911. It is found in Costa Rica. The length of the forewings is 12–14 mm. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Los Quetzales National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica |
More parks will be added in future updates.
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Bryolymnia poasia sighting in Los Quetzales National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 46th most-seen of the 56 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
May
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Bryolymnia poasia in Los Quetzales National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March, June–October and December–January, the lowest months. That is one of Los Quetzales National Park's wettest months, with about 500 mm of rain against 70 mm in February.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Bryolymnia poasia sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Only Los Quetzales National Park, in our data
Los Quetzales National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Bryolymnia poasia sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same order: Lepidoptera
The closest relatives of the Bryolymnia poasia that you can see in Los Quetzales National Park (order Lepidoptera, Butterflies and Moths) are Mexican Silverspot (about 40%), Pure-Banded Dartwhite (about 30%) and Amber Arctiid Moth (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Bryolymnia poasia is recorded against all the insects logged in Los Quetzales National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
