What are the chances of seeing a Colla netrix in Main Ridge Forest Reserve?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Colla netrix sighting in Main Ridge Forest Reserve on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 145th most-seen of the 346 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Colla netrix in Main Ridge Forest Reserve?
February
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Colla netrix in Main Ridge Forest Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in January, March–June and October–November, the lowest months. That is one of Main Ridge Forest Reserve's driest months, with about 60 mm of rain against 230 mm in October.
What time of day is best to see a Colla netrix?
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Colla netrix sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Where else can you see a Colla netrix?
Only Main Ridge Forest Reserve, in our data
Main Ridge Forest Reserve is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Colla netrix sightings: about 20% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Colla netrix live in Main Ridge Forest Reserve?
Same order: Lepidoptera
The closest relatives of the Colla netrix that you can see in Main Ridge Forest Reserve (order Lepidoptera, Butterflies and Moths) are Virbia medarda (about 40%), Red Peacock (about 40%) and Checkered Apogeshna Moth (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Colla netrix sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Colla netrix is recorded against all the insects logged in Main Ridge Forest Reserve (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.