Eucereon punctata
In 3 days ~50% in a week ~80%
Eucereon punctata is a moth of the subfamily Arctiinae. It was described by Félix Édouard Guérin-Méneville in 1844. It is found in Guatemala, Suriname and the Amazon region. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Main Ridge Forest Reserve | 🇹🇹 Trinidad and Tobago |
More parks will be added in future updates.
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Eucereon punctata sighting in Main Ridge Forest Reserve on a given day, based on 15 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 91st most-seen of the 346 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
January
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Eucereon punctata in Main Ridge Forest Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in May–June and October–December, the lowest months. That is one of Main Ridge Forest Reserve's driest months, with about 80 mm of rain against 230 mm in October.
Between 10 pm and 1 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Eucereon punctata sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Only Main Ridge Forest Reserve, in our data
Main Ridge Forest Reserve is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Eucereon punctata sightings: about 20% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same genus: Eucereon
The closest relatives of the Eucereon punctata that you can see in Main Ridge Forest Reserve (genus Eucereon) are Eucereon maja (about 20%) and Eucereon sylvius (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Eucereon punctata is recorded against all the insects logged in Main Ridge Forest Reserve (15 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
