Liopasia ochracealis
In 3 days ~40% in a week ~70%
Liopasia ochracealis is a moth in the family Crambidae. It was described by Francis Walker in 1866. It is found in Ecuador and Brazil. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Main Ridge Forest Reserve | 🇹🇹 Trinidad and Tobago | |
| 2 | Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Liopasia ochracealis sighting in Main Ridge Forest Reserve on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 221st most-seen of the 346 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Liopasia ochracealis in Main Ridge Forest Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in March to December, the lowest months. That is one of Main Ridge Forest Reserve's driest months, with about 60 mm of rain against 230 mm in October.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Liopasia ochracealis sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Liopasia ochracealis sightings, Main Ridge Forest Reserve has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Same genus: Liopasia
The closest relatives of the Liopasia ochracealis that you can see in Main Ridge Forest Reserve (genus Liopasia) are Liopasia apicenotata (about 20%), Liopasia teneralis (about 20%) and Liopasia rufalis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Liopasia ochracealis is recorded against all the insects logged in Main Ridge Forest Reserve (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
