Jamesia globifera
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
Jamesia globifera is a species of beetle in the family Cerambycidae. It was described by Johan Christian Fabricius in 1801. It is known from Costa Rica, Brazil, Bolivia, Colombia, Panama, French Guiana, Nicaragua, Ecuador, Peru, Suriname, Guyana, and Venezuela. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manu National Park | 🇵🇪 Peru |
More parks will be added in future updates.
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Jamesia globifera sighting in Manu National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 203rd most-seen of the 366 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
March and October–January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Jamesia globifera in Manu National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February and April–September, the lowest months.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Jamesia globifera sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Only Manu National Park, in our data
Manu National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Jamesia globifera sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Cerambycidae
The closest relatives of the Jamesia globifera that you can see in Manu National Park (family Cerambycidae, Longhorn Beetles) are Harlequin Beetle (about 10%), Taeniotes orbignyi (about 10%) and Macropophora trochlearis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Jamesia globifera is recorded against all the insects logged in Manu National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
