Polygrammodes ostrealis
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
Polygrammodes ostrealis is a moth in the family Crambidae. It was described by Achille Guenée in 1854. It is found in Brazil. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manu National Park | 🇵🇪 Peru | |
| 2 | Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 3 | La Amistad International Park (Panama) | 🇵🇦 Panama |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Polygrammodes ostrealis sighting in Manu National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 296th most-seen of the 366 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February, May–June and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Polygrammodes ostrealis in Manu National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–April, July–October and December–January, the lowest months.
Between 9 pm and midnight
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Polygrammodes ostrealis sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Polygrammodes ostrealis sightings, Manu National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%) and La Amistad International Park (Panama) (Panama, under 5%).
Same genus: Polygrammodes
The closest relatives of the Polygrammodes ostrealis that you can see in Manu National Park (genus Polygrammodes) are Red-Spotted Sweetpotato Moth (about 10%) and Polygrammodes multifenestrata (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Polygrammodes ostrealis is recorded against all the insects logged in Manu National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
