What are the chances of seeing a Golden Palm Weaver in Meru National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Golden Palm Weaver sighting in Meru National Park on a given day, based on 46 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 64th most-seen of the 243 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Golden Palm Weaver in Meru National Park?
October
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Golden Palm Weaver in Meru National Park on a given day, against about 20% in March, September and December–January, the lowest months. That is one of Meru National Park's wettest months, with about 90 mm of rain against almost none in July. May and July–August have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Golden Palm Weaver?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Golden Palm Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Meru National Park the best place to see a Golden Palm Weaver?
Yes
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Golden Palm Weaver sightings, Meru National Park has the highest daily chance: about 30%. Next come Samburu National Reserve (Kenya, about 20%) and Tsavo East National Park (Kenya, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Golden Palm Weaver live in Meru National Park?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Golden Palm Weaver that you can see in Meru National Park (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Chestnut Weaver (about 60%), Village Weaver (about 20%) and Lesser Masked-Weaver (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Golden Palm Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Golden Palm Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Meru National Park (46 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.