What are the chances of seeing a Dichogama prognealis in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Dichogama prognealis sighting in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve on a given day, based on 14 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 188th most-seen of the 506 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Dichogama prognealis in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve?
September
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Dichogama prognealis in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in October to April, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Dichogama prognealis?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Dichogama prognealis sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve the best place to see a Dichogama prognealis?
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Dichogama prognealis sightings, Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come La Amistad International Park (Panama) (Panama, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Dichogama prognealis live in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve?
Same family: Crambidae
The closest relatives of the Dichogama prognealis that you can see in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (family Crambidae, Crambid Snout Moths) are Cliniodes opalalis (about 20%), Desmia bajulalis (about 20%) and Mulberry Leaftier (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Dichogama prognealis sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Dichogama prognealis is recorded against all the insects logged in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (14 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.