Hagnagora clustimena
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
Hagnagora clustimena is a species of moth of the family Geometridae first described by Herbert Druce in 1893. It is found in Mexico, Panama, Honduras and Costa Rica. Adults are on average smaller than Hagnagora croceitincta and slightly larger than Hagnagora mirandahenrichae. The white transversal blotch on the forewing stretches to the costal margin and the apical dark-brown area reaches vein CuA2, as also observed in H. mirandahenrichae. H. clustimena is slightly paler than H. mirandahenrichae. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 2 | La Amistad International Park (Panama) | 🇵🇦 Panama |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Hagnagora clustimena sighting in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve on a given day, based on 15 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 188th most-seen of the 506 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
September to March
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Hagnagora clustimena in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in April to August, the lowest months.
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Hagnagora clustimena sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Hagnagora clustimena sightings, Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come La Amistad International Park (Panama) (Panama, under 5%).
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Hagnagora clustimena is recorded against all the insects logged in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (15 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
