Turuptiana annesmithae
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~50%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica |
More parks will be added in future updates.
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Turuptiana annesmithae sighting in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve on a given day, based on 32 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 86th most-seen of the 506 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February, April and August
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Turuptiana annesmithae in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in June–July and November–December, the lowest months. Those are among Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve's driest months, with about 130 mm of rain a month against 510 mm in October.
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Turuptiana annesmithae sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Only Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve, in our data
Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Turuptiana annesmithae sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Turuptiana annesmithae that you can see in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Symphlebia perflua (about 10%), Black Witch (about 10%) and Amastus aconia (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Turuptiana annesmithae is recorded against all the insects logged in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (32 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
