Catocala streckeri
In 3 days ~40% in a week ~70%
Catocala streckeri is a moth of the family Erebidae. It is found in the Russian Far East (Amur, Khabarovsk, Primorye, Sakhalin, Southern Kuriles), Korea, China and Japan (Hokkaido, Honshu, Shikoku). The wingspan is about 52 mm. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nikko National Park | 🇯🇵 Japan |
More parks will be added in future updates.
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seoul | 🇰🇷 South Korea |
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Catocala streckeri sighting in Nikko National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 53rd most-seen of the 86 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
June and July
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Catocala streckeri in Nikko National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–May and August–December, the lowest months.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Catocala streckeri sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Only Nikko National Park, in our data
Nikko National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Catocala streckeri sightings: about 20% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Catocala streckeri that you can see in Nikko National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Kidokuga piperita (about 20%), Macrobrochis staudingeri (about 20%) and Ramie Moth (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Catocala streckeri is recorded against all the insects logged in Nikko National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
