What are the chances of seeing a Chestnut-capped Flycatcher in Odzala-Kokoua National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-capped Flycatcher sighting in Odzala-Kokoua National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 65th most-seen of the 72 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chestnut-capped Flycatcher in Odzala-Kokoua National Park?
April
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-capped Flycatcher in Odzala-Kokoua National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May, July–September and November–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Chestnut-capped Flycatcher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chestnut-capped Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Odzala-Kokoua National Park the best place to see a Chestnut-capped Flycatcher?
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Chestnut-capped Flycatcher sightings, Odzala-Kokoua National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Semuliki National Park (Uganda, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Chestnut-capped Flycatcher live in Odzala-Kokoua National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Chestnut-capped Flycatcher that you can see in Odzala-Kokoua National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Lesser Striped-Swallow (about 40%), Common Bulbul (about 40%) and Spotted Greenbul (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chestnut-capped Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chestnut-capped Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Odzala-Kokoua National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.