Tropidischia xanthostoma
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~50%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Redwood National Park | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 2 | Pacific Rim National Park Reserve | 🇨🇦 Canada | |
| 3 | Olympic National Park | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 4 | Great Bear Rainforest | 🇨🇦 Canada |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vancouver | 🇨🇦 Canada |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Square-Legged Camel Cricket sighting in Olympic National Park on a given day, based on 28 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 40th most-seen of the 207 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
March
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Square-Legged Camel Cricket in Olympic National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June and November–January, the lowest months.
Between 9 pm and midnight
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Square-Legged Camel Cricket sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
3rd of 4
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Square-Legged Camel Cricket sightings, Olympic National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Redwood National Park (United States, about 20%) and Pacific Rim National Park Reserve (Canada, about 20%).
Same order: Orthoptera
The closest relatives of the Square-Legged Camel Cricket that you can see in Olympic National Park (order Orthoptera, Grasshoppers, Crickets, and Katydids) are Olympic Grasshopper (about 10%), Crackling Forest Grasshopper (about 10%) and Clear-Winged Grasshopper (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Square-Legged Camel Cricket is recorded against all the insects logged in Olympic National Park (28 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
