What are the chances of seeing a Pale Glyph in Pacific Rim National Park Reserve?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pale Glyph sighting in Pacific Rim National Park Reserve on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 68th most-seen of the 107 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pale Glyph in Pacific Rim National Park Reserve?
June
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Pale Glyph in Pacific Rim National Park Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in August to May, the lowest months. That is one of Pacific Rim National Park Reserve's driest months, with about 85 mm of rain against 470 mm in November.
What time of day is best to see a Pale Glyph?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pale Glyph sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Pacific Rim National Park Reserve the best place to see a Pale Glyph?
Among the best
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Pale Glyph sightings, Pacific Rim National Park Reserve ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Elk Island National Park (Canada, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Pale Glyph live in Pacific Rim National Park Reserve?
Same family: Noctuidae
The closest relatives of the Pale Glyph that you can see in Pacific Rim National Park Reserve (family Noctuidae, Cutworm Moths and Allies) are Large Yellow Underwing (about 10%), Western Panthea Moth (about 10%) and Cattail Borer Moth (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pale Glyph sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pale Glyph is recorded against all the insects logged in Pacific Rim National Park Reserve (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.