What are the chances of seeing a Carabus auronitens in Pyrénées National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Carabus auronitens sighting in Pyrénées National Park on a given day, based on 14 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 703rd most-seen of the 1277 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Carabus auronitens in Pyrénées National Park?
February to June
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Carabus auronitens in Pyrénées National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July to January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Carabus auronitens?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Carabus auronitens sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Pyrénées National Park the best place to see a Carabus auronitens?
4th of 4
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Carabus auronitens sightings, Pyrénées National Park ranks 4th at under 5%. The best odds are in Tatra National Park (Slovakia, about 20%), Bavarian Forest National Park (Germany, about 20%) and Vanoise National Park (France, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Carabus auronitens live in Pyrénées National Park?
Same genus: Carabus
The closest relatives of the Carabus auronitens that you can see in Pyrénées National Park (genus Carabus, Worm and Slug Hunters) are Carabus splendens (about 20%), Bronze Ground Beetle (about 10%) and Carabus purpurascens (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Carabus auronitens sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Carabus auronitens is recorded against all the insects logged in Pyrénées National Park (14 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.