What are the chances of seeing a Yellow-mantled Weaver in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow-mantled Weaver sighting in Queen Elizabeth National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 395th most-seen of the 434 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Yellow-mantled Weaver in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow-mantled Weaver in Queen Elizabeth National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Yellow-mantled Weaver?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Yellow-mantled Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Queen Elizabeth National Park the best place to see a Yellow-mantled Weaver?
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Yellow-mantled Weaver sightings, Queen Elizabeth National Park ranks 2nd at under 5%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Kibale National Park (Uganda, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Yellow-mantled Weaver live in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Yellow-mantled Weaver that you can see in Queen Elizabeth National Park (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Black-headed Weaver (about 40%), Village Weaver (about 40%) and Slender-billed Weaver (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Yellow-mantled Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Yellow-mantled Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Queen Elizabeth National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.