What are the chances of seeing a Black-necked Weaver in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-necked Weaver sighting in Queen Elizabeth National Park on a given day, based on 55 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 240th most-seen of the 434 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-necked Weaver in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
January and March–May
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black-necked Weaver in Queen Elizabeth National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February and June–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Black-necked Weaver?
Between 5 and 8 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-necked Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Queen Elizabeth National Park the best place to see a Black-necked Weaver?
14th of 19
Of the 19 parks where we can rate Black-necked Weaver sightings, Queen Elizabeth National Park ranks 14th at under 5%. The best odds are in Kibale National Park (Uganda, about 40%), Bwindi Impenetrable National Park (Uganda, about 30%) and Mkomazi National Park (Tanzania, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Black-necked Weaver live in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Black-necked Weaver that you can see in Queen Elizabeth National Park (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Black-headed Weaver (about 40%), Village Weaver (about 40%) and Slender-billed Weaver (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-necked Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-necked Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Queen Elizabeth National Park (55 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.