What are the chances of seeing a Proteuxoa tetronycha in Rakiura National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Proteuxoa tetronycha sighting in Rakiura National Park on a given day, based on 29 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 25th most-seen of the 118 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Proteuxoa tetronycha in Rakiura National Park?
November to January
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Proteuxoa tetronycha in Rakiura National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February to October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Proteuxoa tetronycha?
Between 10 pm and 1 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Proteuxoa tetronycha sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Rakiura National Park the best place to see a Proteuxoa tetronycha?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Proteuxoa tetronycha sightings, Rakiura National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Arthur's Pass National Park (New Zealand, about 10%) and Fiordland National Park (New Zealand, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Proteuxoa tetronycha live in Rakiura National Park?
Same family: Noctuidae
The closest relatives of the Proteuxoa tetronycha that you can see in Rakiura National Park (family Noctuidae, Cutworm Moths and Allies) are New Zealand Cutworm (about 30%), Ichneutica atristriga (about 20%) and Ichneutica mollis (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Proteuxoa tetronycha sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Proteuxoa tetronycha is recorded against all the insects logged in Rakiura National Park (29 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.