Dictyoptera simplicipes
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~50%
Dictyoptera simplicipes is a species of net-winged beetle in the family Lycidae. It is found in North America. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Olympic National Park | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 2 | Pacific Rim National Park Reserve | 🇨🇦 Canada | |
| 3 | Redwood National Park | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 4 | Great Bear Rainforest | 🇨🇦 Canada | |
| 5 | Banff National Park | 🇨🇦 Canada | |
| 6 | Jasper National Park | 🇨🇦 Canada | |
| 7 | Yosemite National Park | 🇺🇸 United States |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vancouver | 🇨🇦 Canada |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Red Net-Winged Beetle sighting in Redwood National Park on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 37th most-seen of the 101 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
May
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Red Net-Winged Beetle in Redwood National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June to January, the lowest months. That is one of Redwood National Park's driest months, with about 90 mm of rain against 360 mm in January.
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red Net-Winged Beetle sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Among the best
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Red Net-Winged Beetle sightings, Redwood National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Olympic National Park (United States, about 10%) and Pacific Rim National Park Reserve (Canada, about 10%).
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red Net-Winged Beetle is recorded against all the insects logged in Redwood National Park (12 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
