Tropidischia xanthostoma
In 3 days ~50% in a week ~80%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Redwood National Park | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 2 | Pacific Rim National Park Reserve | 🇨🇦 Canada | |
| 3 | Olympic National Park | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 4 | Great Bear Rainforest | 🇨🇦 Canada |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vancouver | 🇨🇦 Canada |
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Square-Legged Camel Cricket sighting in Redwood National Park on a given day, based on 46 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 3rd most-seen of the 101 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
May, August–September and December
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Square-Legged Camel Cricket in Redwood National Park on a given day, against about 10% in June, the lowest month.
Between 9 pm and midnight
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Square-Legged Camel Cricket sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Yes
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Square-Legged Camel Cricket sightings, Redwood National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Pacific Rim National Park Reserve (Canada, about 20%) and Olympic National Park (United States, about 10%).
Same order: Orthoptera
The closest relatives of the Square-Legged Camel Cricket that you can see in Redwood National Park (order Orthoptera, Grasshoppers, Crickets, and Katydids) are Helfer's Dune Grasshopper (about 10%), Carolina Grasshopper (about 10%) and Clear-Winged Grasshopper (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Square-Legged Camel Cricket is recorded against all the insects logged in Redwood National Park (46 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
