What are the chances of seeing a Saffron-Winged Meadowhawk in Riding Mountain National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Saffron-Winged Meadowhawk sighting in Riding Mountain National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 66th most-seen of the 104 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Saffron-Winged Meadowhawk in Riding Mountain National Park?
September
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Saffron-Winged Meadowhawk in Riding Mountain National Park on a given day, against under 5% in November to June, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Saffron-Winged Meadowhawk?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Saffron-Winged Meadowhawk sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Riding Mountain National Park the best place to see a Saffron-Winged Meadowhawk?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Saffron-Winged Meadowhawk sightings, Riding Mountain National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Grand Teton National Park (United States, about 10%) and Yellowstone National Park (United States, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Saffron-Winged Meadowhawk live in Riding Mountain National Park?
Same genus: Sympetrum
The closest relatives of the Saffron-Winged Meadowhawk that you can see in Riding Mountain National Park (genus Sympetrum, Meadowhawks) are Black Meadowhawk (about 10%) and White-Faced Meadowhawk (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Saffron-Winged Meadowhawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Saffron-Winged Meadowhawk is recorded against all the insects logged in Riding Mountain National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.