What are the chances of seeing a Dot-Tailed Whiteface in Riding Mountain National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Dot-Tailed Whiteface sighting in Riding Mountain National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 66th most-seen of the 104 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Dot-Tailed Whiteface in Riding Mountain National Park?
June
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Dot-Tailed Whiteface in Riding Mountain National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July to May, the lowest months. That is one of Riding Mountain National Park's wettest months, with about 100 mm of rain against 20 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Dot-Tailed Whiteface?
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Dot-Tailed Whiteface sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Riding Mountain National Park the best place to see a Dot-Tailed Whiteface?
Among the best
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Dot-Tailed Whiteface sightings, Riding Mountain National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Elk Island National Park (Canada, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Dot-Tailed Whiteface live in Riding Mountain National Park?
Same genus: Leucorrhinia
The closest relatives of the Dot-Tailed Whiteface that you can see in Riding Mountain National Park (genus Leucorrhinia, Whitefaces) are Belted Whiteface (about 10%) and Boreal Whiteface (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Dot-Tailed Whiteface sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Dot-Tailed Whiteface is recorded against all the insects logged in Riding Mountain National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.