What are the chances of seeing a Black-faced Warbler in Royal Manas National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black-faced Warbler sighting in Royal Manas National Park on a given day, based on 136 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 135th most-seen of the 388 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-faced Warbler in Royal Manas National Park?
November
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Black-faced Warbler in Royal Manas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, June and October, the lowest months. That is one of Royal Manas National Park's driest months, with about 15 mm of rain against 930 mm in July. August and September have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Black-faced Warbler?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-faced Warbler sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Royal Manas National Park the best place to see a Black-faced Warbler?
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Black-faced Warbler sightings, Royal Manas National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Langtang National Park (Nepal, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Black-faced Warbler live in Royal Manas National Park?
Same genus: Abroscopus
The closest relatives of the Black-faced Warbler that you can see in Royal Manas National Park (genus Abroscopus, Abroscopus Warblers) are Yellow-bellied Warbler (about 20%) and Rufous-faced Warbler (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-faced Warbler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-faced Warbler is recorded against all the birds logged in Royal Manas National Park (136 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.