What are the chances of seeing a Broad-billed Warbler in Royal Manas National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Broad-billed Warbler sighting in Royal Manas National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 327th most-seen of the 388 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Broad-billed Warbler in Royal Manas National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Broad-billed Warbler in Royal Manas National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season. August and September have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Broad-billed Warbler?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Broad-billed Warbler sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Where else can you see a Broad-billed Warbler?
Only Royal Manas National Park, in our data
Royal Manas National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Broad-billed Warbler sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Broad-billed Warbler live in Royal Manas National Park?
Same family: Cettiidae
The closest relatives of the Broad-billed Warbler that you can see in Royal Manas National Park (family Cettiidae, Bush Warblers and Allies) are Yellow-bellied Warbler (about 20%), Rufous-faced Warbler (about 20%) and Black-faced Warbler (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Broad-billed Warbler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Broad-billed Warbler is recorded against all the birds logged in Royal Manas National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.