What are the chances of seeing an Ocnogyna zoraida in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Ocnogyna zoraida sighting in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 388th most-seen of the 597 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Ocnogyna zoraida in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park?
April
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Ocnogyna zoraida in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May to March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Ocnogyna zoraida?
Between 9 pm and midnight
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ocnogyna zoraida sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Where else can you see an Ocnogyna zoraida?
Only Sierra de Guadarrama National Park, in our data
Sierra de Guadarrama National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Ocnogyna zoraida sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Ocnogyna zoraida live in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Ocnogyna zoraida that you can see in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Cinnabar Moth (about 20%), Jersey Tiger (about 10%) and Oak Yellow Underwing (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ocnogyna zoraida sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ocnogyna zoraida is recorded against all the insects logged in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.