Baizongia pistaciae
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~50%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sierra Nevada National Park | 🇪🇸 Spain | |
| 2 | Cévennes National Park | 🇫🇷 France |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jerusalem | 🇮🇱 Israel |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pistacia Horn Gall Aphid sighting in Sierra Nevada National Park on a given day, based on 17 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 390th most-seen of the 479 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
March and September
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Pistacia Horn Gall Aphid in Sierra Nevada National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May, July–August and October–February, the lowest months. Those are among Sierra Nevada National Park's wettest months, with about 95 mm of rain a month against 30 mm in July.
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pistacia Horn Gall Aphid sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Pistacia Horn Gall Aphid sightings, Sierra Nevada National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Cévennes National Park (France, about 10%).
Same family: Aphididae
The closest relatives of the Pistacia Horn Gall Aphid that you can see in Sierra Nevada National Park (family Aphididae, Aphids) are Elm-Currant Aphid (about 10%), Pemphigus populi (about 10%) and Pistachio-Grass Root Aphid (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pistacia Horn Gall Aphid is recorded against all the insects logged in Sierra Nevada National Park (17 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
