What are the chances of seeing an Addaea subtessellata in Springbrook National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Addaea subtessellata sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 312th most-seen of the 429 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Addaea subtessellata in Springbrook National Park?
February–March, July–September and December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Addaea subtessellata in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, April–June and October–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Addaea subtessellata?
Between 6 and 9 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Addaea subtessellata sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Where else can you see an Addaea subtessellata?
Only Springbrook National Park, in our data
Springbrook National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Addaea subtessellata sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Addaea subtessellata live in Springbrook National Park?
Same family: Thyrididae
The closest relatives of the Addaea subtessellata that you can see in Springbrook National Park (family Thyrididae, Window-winged Moths) are Oxycophina theorina (about 10%) and Hypolamprus ypsilon (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Addaea subtessellata sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Addaea subtessellata is recorded against all the insects logged in Springbrook National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.