What are the chances of seeing an Anaxidia lozogramma in Springbrook National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Anaxidia lozogramma sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 228th most-seen of the 429 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Anaxidia lozogramma in Springbrook National Park?
July
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Anaxidia lozogramma in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–February, April–June and September–October, the lowest months. That is one of Springbrook National Park's driest months, with about 50 mm of rain against 210 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see an Anaxidia lozogramma?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Anaxidia lozogramma sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Where else can you see an Anaxidia lozogramma?
Only Springbrook National Park, in our data
Springbrook National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Anaxidia lozogramma sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Anaxidia lozogramma live in Springbrook National Park?
Same family: Limacodidae
The closest relatives of the Anaxidia lozogramma that you can see in Springbrook National Park (family Limacodidae, Slug Caterpillar Moths) are Macadamia Cup Moth (about 10%) and Mottled Cup Moth (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Anaxidia lozogramma sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Anaxidia lozogramma is recorded against all the insects logged in Springbrook National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.