What are the chances of seeing a Heteroteucha kershawi in Springbrook National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Heteroteucha kershawi sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 358th most-seen of the 429 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Heteroteucha kershawi in Springbrook National Park?
June
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Heteroteucha kershawi in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–May, July and October–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Heteroteucha kershawi?
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Heteroteucha kershawi sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Where else can you see a Heteroteucha kershawi?
Only Springbrook National Park, in our data
Springbrook National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Heteroteucha kershawi sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Heteroteucha kershawi live in Springbrook National Park?
Same family: Oecophoridae
The closest relatives of the Heteroteucha kershawi that you can see in Springbrook National Park (family Oecophoridae, Concealer Moths) are Euchaetis rhizobola (about 10%), Pycnocera hypoxantha (about 10%) and Chezala osteochroa (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Heteroteucha kershawi sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Heteroteucha kershawi is recorded against all the insects logged in Springbrook National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.