What are the chances of seeing a White-necked Babbler in Taman Negara National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a White-necked Babbler sighting in Taman Negara National Park on a given day, based on 30 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 203rd most-seen of the 293 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a White-necked Babbler in Taman Negara National Park?
July and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a White-necked Babbler in Taman Negara National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August–October and December–June, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a White-necked Babbler?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most White-necked Babbler sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Where else can you see a White-necked Babbler?
Only Taman Negara National Park, in our data
Taman Negara National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate White-necked Babbler sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the White-necked Babbler live in Taman Negara National Park?
Same genus: Stachyris
The closest relatives of the White-necked Babbler that you can see in Taman Negara National Park (genus Stachyris, Typical Tree-Babblers) are Chestnut-winged Babbler (about 40%), Chestnut-rumped Babbler (about 20%) and Black-throated Babbler (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the White-necked Babbler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the White-necked Babbler is recorded against all the birds logged in Taman Negara National Park (30 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.