What are the chances of seeing a Chestnut-rumped Babbler in Taman Negara National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-rumped Babbler sighting in Taman Negara National Park on a given day, based on 295 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 49th most-seen of the 293 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chestnut-rumped Babbler in Taman Negara National Park?
August
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-rumped Babbler in Taman Negara National Park on a given day, against about 10% in February, April and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Chestnut-rumped Babbler?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chestnut-rumped Babbler sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Taman Negara National Park the best place to see a Chestnut-rumped Babbler?
Yes
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Chestnut-rumped Babbler sightings, Taman Negara National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Danum Valley Conservation Area (Malaysia, about 20%) and Way Kambas National Park (Indonesia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Chestnut-rumped Babbler live in Taman Negara National Park?
Same genus: Stachyris
The closest relatives of the Chestnut-rumped Babbler that you can see in Taman Negara National Park (genus Stachyris, Typical Tree-Babblers) are Chestnut-winged Babbler (about 40%) and Black-throated Babbler (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chestnut-rumped Babbler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chestnut-rumped Babbler is recorded against all the birds logged in Taman Negara National Park (295 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.