What are the chances of seeing an Eretris hulda in Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Eretris hulda sighting in Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 125th most-seen of the 187 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Eretris hulda in Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park?
March–May and December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Eretris hulda in Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–February and June–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Eretris hulda?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Eretris hulda sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park the best place to see an Eretris hulda?
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Eretris hulda sightings, Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Los Quetzales National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Eretris hulda live in Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Eretris hulda that you can see in Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Mexican Silverspot (about 20%), Common Morpho (about 10%) and Lamplight Actinote (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Eretris hulda sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Eretris hulda is recorded against all the insects logged in Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.