What are the chances of seeing a Megaloblatta blaberoides in Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Megaloblatta blaberoides sighting in Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 125th most-seen of the 187 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Megaloblatta blaberoides in Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park?
February to April
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Megaloblatta blaberoides in Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May to January, the lowest months. Those are among Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park's driest months, with about 210 mm of rain a month against 570 mm in October.
What time of day is best to see a Megaloblatta blaberoides?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Megaloblatta blaberoides sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park the best place to see a Megaloblatta blaberoides?
Among the best
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Megaloblatta blaberoides sightings, Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park ranks 4th at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (Costa Rica, about 10%), Braulio Carrillo National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%) and Arenal Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Where does the Megaloblatta blaberoides sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Megaloblatta blaberoides is recorded against all the insects logged in Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
