Polygrammodes mimetica
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~50%
Polygrammodes mimetica is a moth in the family Crambidae. It was described by Eugene G. Munroe in 1960. It is found in Panama and Costa Rica. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 2 | Braulio Carrillo National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Polygrammodes mimetica sighting in Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park on a given day, based on 17 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 28th most-seen of the 187 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Polygrammodes mimetica in Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to January, the lowest months. That is one of Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park's driest months, with about 160 mm of rain against 570 mm in October.
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Polygrammodes mimetica sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Polygrammodes mimetica sightings, Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Braulio Carrillo National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Same genus: Polygrammodes
The closest relatives of the Polygrammodes mimetica that you can see in Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park (genus Polygrammodes) are Polygrammodes sanguinalis (about 10%) and Polygrammodes ostrealis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Polygrammodes mimetica is recorded against all the insects logged in Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park (17 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
