What are the chances of seeing a Formosan Whistling-Thrush in Taroko National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Formosan Whistling-Thrush sighting in Taroko National Park on a given day, based on 661 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 21st most-seen of the 147 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Formosan Whistling-Thrush in Taroko National Park?
December
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Formosan Whistling-Thrush in Taroko National Park on a given day, against about 20% in February, July and October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Formosan Whistling-Thrush?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Formosan Whistling-Thrush sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Where else can you see a Formosan Whistling-Thrush?
Only Taroko National Park, in our data
Taroko National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Formosan Whistling-Thrush sightings: about 30% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Formosan Whistling-Thrush live in Taroko National Park?
Same family: Muscicapidae
The closest relatives of the Formosan Whistling-Thrush that you can see in Taroko National Park (family Muscicapidae, Old World Flycatchers, Robins, and Chats) are Collared Bush-Robin (about 40%), Plumbeous Water Redstart (about 30%) and Vivid Niltava (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Formosan Whistling-Thrush sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Formosan Whistling-Thrush is recorded against all the birds logged in Taroko National Park (661 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.