What are the chances of seeing a Rhyacornis fuliginosa in Taroko National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Rhyacornis fuliginosa sighting in Taroko National Park on a given day, based on 16 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 46th most-seen of the 147 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rhyacornis fuliginosa in Taroko National Park?
February
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Rhyacornis fuliginosa in Taroko National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April–May, July and September–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Rhyacornis fuliginosa?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rhyacornis fuliginosa sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Where else can you see a Rhyacornis fuliginosa?
Only Taroko National Park, in our data
Taroko National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Rhyacornis fuliginosa sightings: about 20% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Rhyacornis fuliginosa live in Taroko National Park?
Same family: Muscicapidae
The closest relatives of the Rhyacornis fuliginosa that you can see in Taroko National Park (family Muscicapidae, Old World Flycatchers, Robins, and Chats) are Collared Bush-Robin (about 40%), Plumbeous Water Redstart (about 30%) and Formosan Whistling-Thrush (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rhyacornis fuliginosa sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rhyacornis fuliginosa is recorded against all the birds logged in Taroko National Park (16 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.